“Rules for Thee and Not for Me”

A few years ago Mark Driscoll got into trouble over plagiarism in his books. One of the books, Trial: 8 Witnesses from 1-2 Peter, had paragraphs taken from New Bible Commentary, edited by Gordon J. Wenham, J. Alec Motyer, Donald A. Carson, and R. T. France . The book was eventually pulled because of the plagiarism. 

After the plagiarism was discovered and before the book was taken off the market, Doug Wilson wrote a blog post with his thoughts on the controversy. Wilson said:

All that said, at an objective minimum, there is a gross citation problem in Driscoll’s book Trial, which needs to be acknowledged, owned and corrected. Looking at the two relevant sections, side by side, we know that there is a citation problem. What we don’t know is why or how it got there, about which more in a little bit. But regardless, however it got there, it needs to get out of there. The problem should be owned and corrected, in public, by the author and the publisher. The same goes for anything comparable. (emphasis added)

He also said:

The production of a book involves numerous people who handle the words prior to publication, unlike a term paper. How could something bad get in? Well, think about research assistants, copy editors, copy editors who think they should have been the author, copy editors who think they should have been the fuehrer, content editors, politically correct content editors, and so on. Just a few weeks ago I had the experience of opening a book I wrote only to have my eyes light upon something that I could never have possibly written, and which some helpful editor (or gnome in the printing press) had inserted for me. It was quite embarrassing, but I didn’t do it, although this leads to the next point. I am nevertheless responsible for it. My name is on the cover.


This is a good argument for only using researchers who are extremely honest, competent, and reliable, and with a system of cross checks in place. But with all said and done, the person whose name is on the cover of the book is responsible to put things completely right if a problem surfaces.  (emphasis added)

Given the nature of his comments one could easily suppose he was talking about the plagiarism in the Omnibus. Unfortunately, these quotes are considerably different from his current response to the plagiarism in the Omnibus volumes.

But maybe the examples from Driscoll’s book, Trial, were more extensive or different in some way? Well, here are the examples of the plagiarism that I could find.



These are certainly strong examples of plagiarism. You can see that the examples are mostly word for word, but with some modifications. In fact, these examples are very similar to many of the examples of plagiarism from the Omnibus volumes. Consider these:

Volume I page 526

James, pg 526 (Bruce Etter) This is from the text of the Omnibus essay on James. The material is from the commentary in the NKJV, The Open Bible’s introduction to James, page 1269.

Volume II, page 113

The Rule of St. Benedict, pg 113 (Gregg Strawbridge) This example is from the text of the essay on The Rule of St. Benedict. The original source is an entry in the Catholic encyclopedia, New Advent.

Volume III, page 155

Reflections on the Revolution in France, pg 155 (Douglas Wilson, Natali H. Miller) This example comes from the text of a session following the essay “Reflections on the Revolution in France.” The material was taken from the Internet Modern History Sourcebook. The French text of La Marseillaise is public domain, but the history here and the English translation are copyrighted. The copyright information says, “No permission is granted for commercial use of the Sourcebook. © Paul Halsall Aug 1997.”

Volume IV, page 366

Gospel of Mark, pg 366 (Bruce Etter) This example comes from the text of the essay on Mark. The source is from an article, “The Use of εὐθύς (“immediately”) in Mark,” by Professor Rodney J. Decker. It was published in the Journal for Ministry and Theology in 1997.

Volume V, page 17

The City of God, pg 17 (Douglas Wilson, Graham Dennis) This example is from an image caption. The image and the text come from a book, Light at Ground Zero: St. Paul’s Chapel After 9/11, by Krystyna Sanderson. The Omnibus volume gives image credit to Sanderson as the photographer.

Volume VI, page 342

The Sun Also Rises, pg 342 (Nathan Tillman) This is from the text of a session after the essay on The Sun Also Rises. The English translation of the German text is by Mimmi Fulmer and Ric Merritt and is copyrighted. Neither author was cited in the Omnibus text. The copyright says, “To reprint and distribute this author’s work for concert programs, CD booklets, etc., you must ask the copyright-holder(s) directly for permission. If you receive no response, you must consider it a refusal.”

These are merely six examples, one from each volume. Each of these examples is mostly word for word. None of these are from open sources like Wikipedia. The only difference between the Omnibus examples and the Driscoll ones is that there are more of them from the Omnibus. I’m honestly not sure why the “rules” that applied to the Driscoll plagiarism don’t apply to the Omnibus.

I’ll close with a quote from Wilson regarding the plagiarism from A Justice Primer:

In such circumstances, when plagiarism is detected, the one who finds it has every right to look at the cover and decide right on the spot who is responsible. The names on the cover are the ones with the authorial responsibility, which is the primary responsibility according to contract, and the editorial imprint is the one with the publisher’s responsibility, also specified by contract. Further investigation might reveal where particular culpability lies, but the responsibility for the project flows (according to God’s design) to the names on the cover.


8 thoughts on ““Rules for Thee and Not for Me”

  1. Julie Anne says:

    Rachel, you can’t use Wilson’s quote from A Justice Primer – – that book, too, was pulled for plagiarism. It was obviously written by someone else. 🙂

    The sad thing about this is “Pastor” Doug Wilson has a chronic pattern of lying, plagiarizing, blame-shifting, projecting, saying one thing and meaning the other, and then blaming readers for not understanding. Even sadder is that he has a bunch of hero worshippers and blind followers who defend and protect him when the evidence is clear.

    It it looks like a cult, walks like a cult . . .


  2. Darrel says:

    Tragically, Doug’s supporters (some of whom I count among my friends) will accept Doug’s explanations, end of story. Or if they disagree, they won’t say so publicly. When Doug speaks on a matter, our job is to agree, and if we disagree, our job is to remain silent. Doug has taught them well.

    Not surprising to me, the same observation was made by Robert McKenzie, the University of Washington professor and then-current CREC member who, as far as I am aware, first detected plagiarism in Wilson’s orbit (though his problems with the southern slavery book went far deeper). He writes:

    ‘Wilson was gracious to me in all of these private interactions, but he made it clear that if I disagreed with him publicly I would be undermining his work for God’s kingdom. As he wrote in one e-mail, “either you remain out of the fracas,” referring to the tempest then swirling around the booklet, “or you fight alongside me, or you get co-opted by their side,” referring to the secular “intoleristas” who opposed his ministry. In sum, unless I was willing to endorse his views or remain silent, I would inevitably aid the cause of his enemies–and his enemies were God’s enemies’



  3. Grammarian says:

    Copies of the greatest works in literature by the most brilliant, celebrated UberMensch writers lie – in incoherent heaps, spines torn, covers bent and scored – in giant cardboard recycling skids in the local recycling center. Since this inevitably turns out to be the case, why go to such disgraceful lengths merely to put another book in print; one which history will no doubt judge inferior to a great many others? Not even for a mess of pottage, nor a scorpion or a snake as a reward. What vile creature has latch onto the brain stems of these men? May the Lord reward your valuable work a hundred times; nevertheless this heart can not help but sink into a leaden gloom as the evidence scrolls on by… and by… and by.


  4. Terri Rice says:

    When Rachel discovered Douglas Wilson’s plagiarism I predicted in her first post on his plagiarism that he’d spin it:

    “So is it only the students at the Wilson schools who are held to the higher standard of not plagiarizing? Is it only the students who have to leave the school, tail between their legs, for plagiarism? I wait breathlessly for the spin that will be forthcoming.”

    Okay, I’m not much of a soothsayer to have know Douglas Wilson would exhonerate himself; never mind the blatant proof. Autocrats don’t have to obey the rules; rules are for plebes. Rules are for the students at the Wilson schools and for men like Mark Driscoll.

    There is something eternally sad about a “pastor” thinking more highly of himself than he ought.


  5. Wemmick Girl Saved by Grace says:

    Applause coming from me. You are brave and beautiful. I pray God uses your work to poke the eyeballs of the devil.


    On Monday, May 9, 2016, A Daughter of the Reformation wrote:

    > Rachel Miller posted: “A few years ago Mark Driscoll got into trouble over > plagiarism in his books. One of the books, Trial: 8 Witnesses from 1-2 > Peter, had paragraphs taken from New Bible Commentary, edited by Gordon J. > Wenham, J. Alec Motyer, Donald A. Carson, and R. T. Franc” >


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s